Serendipity Forums

Oh it does work well with my local 1.5.4 installation. When did it change to support the new lang method?
Ok here your are
edit updated zip of first post

After so many people having such a big discussion - what shall we do with it?
It is a small improvement, using default nl2br, so I would pleg for upload.

Hi!

Come on guys, someone must be using nl2br and be annoyed by its current workage. YellowLED?!

I still wasn't able to test it on my own, I'm sorry...

(I really try to look at it, and even if I don't manage to do it before 1.6 [which I hope will not happen], I'll upload it to Spartacus at the very least. )

Regards,
Garvin

I'm perfectly fine with it. (really?! )

Well, because my entries are mostly just one image and text, it's working just fine. I even changed to using <p> instead of <br> after updating to your version, Timbalu.

Mist, another one hopping to P - I hope not because of the new ISOBR

Timbalu wrote:Mist, another one hopping to P - I hope not because of the new ISOBR

Nah not really, it made no change to my entries. Just made the code look neater, I suppose. And I suppose paragraphs should use the <p> tag anyways, so.

Ian, why don't we try to improve nl2p instead?

Hi Malte
I did not try to do, since you can already do things like <nl>inside no parsing</nl> with it, when specifying <nl> as a example prevent tag, I assume. I just tried to have some sort of isolation for br too.

Update: added 4th version (2.11) on 2011-07-05
in special cases there was a leftover, which made editors with foldable Textblocks stumble

Thanks for the plugin, it's just what I needed

But why not change <nl> to <pre> 'cos that's basically what you're doing...

Yes, but an hardcoded existing tag would'nt be as free as a non-existing-tag like <nl>. Imagine someones is using pre without code syntax and just wants normal line breaks inside...

Timbalu wrote:Yes, but an hardcoded existing tag would'nt be as free as a non-existing-tag like <nl>.

You'll have to change that if XHTML2 ever becomes a standard, BTW.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-200 ... #sec_11.2.

YL

Oh my god....! Thank you, YL.
Will it ever? To short I know, but I thought HTML5 is avoiding the further need of XHTML? It still would need someone writing entries in xhtml2, which should be extremely rarely, I assume. But I keep that in mind changing to something like <nonl></nonl>.

******btw******
What I have in mind would be some kind of hook via the nl2br plugin, integrating a BBC button for this element into the BBC row of the normal non-wysiwyg-editor 'frame'. If someone has an idea how to code this, please drop me a notice.