Then:
Well, while I understand that somehow, I just wanted to let you know why i regard this as a very bad idea. Just look at this: Many major blogs in Germany allow (X)HTML in comments and yet, no user complained - those who can't do XHTML simply don't use it and post text without any markup.garvinhicking wrote: Current templates focus on usability and compatibility instead of pedantic semantics![]()
Yeah, but will any one else do if I don't ?No one expects this of you!
They will do that forever, is that clear to you ? The spec only allows a DOM tree only to be generated from well-formed documents.To me personally, the matter is not interesting yet because of the choking browser behavior on non-validating XHTML documents.
Sadly, this more than often violates the robustness principle - XML does, too, but with XML it is clear how to interpret the data.I'm all for "ultra liberal HTML parsing".![]()