Today I released my "plugin playground" CommentSpice to Spartacus. CommentSpice enhances the comment area of your S9Y blog. It adds extra inputs: The commenter can add his twitter or identica name, and advertise one of his last blog posts. You can configure how many comments he has to have...

Hmm.. I'm not sure if I understood this hack right, but: Didn't s9y (and any page using this hack) already saved some cookies when this JS/Cookie based form shows up? Is this a valid solution to the (unknown to me) "EU law"? I think: Even if we put it into a plugin, it has the same problem...

Prima, hatte genau das selbe Problem und keinen Switch für ask.com gefunden. Nun auf Grund dieses Artikels noch mal geschaut: Man stellt es in der "URL-Liste für Pings" ein. Ich habe dann jetzt Google und Bing eingetragen: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/ping?sitemap=%s;http://www.b...

Einfach mal den String bei Google eingeben..
Das hat nichts mit S9Y zu tun, sondern mit einem bei Dir installierten Firefox Plugin:

Die Ursache war weder Joomla noch Firefox, sondern das Firefox AddOn "Fritz!Boox AddOn". Nach deaktivieren (und Neustart Firefox) war das Problem behoben.

Quick fix: The "Cache all entries" menu entry is visible only, when you switch on caching again..

But if the caching entries are used although you switched off caching, this would be a bug..

Both. I have autolearn on and marked them as SPAM when clearing recycler in times we were allowed to do this.

But I also receive a lot of SPAM comments, of course.

It's the same (well, not that unbalanced)

Name Homepage E-Mail IP Referrer Kommentar
Valid Spam Valid Spam Valid Spam Valid Spam Valid Spam Valid Spam
130 24554 126 20639 97 1978 127 2746 100 1571 130 11606

Did you check wether your db is really that unbalanced? As I described, it does not necessarily have to be that way (e.g. in my blog "body" is evenly distributed, the other fields have way more spam). SELECT SUM(ham),SUM(spam) FROM `serendipity_spamblock_bayes` WHERE `type` = 'body' SUM(h...

Sure, that probability raises as more spam is classified, but i fear that the factor you described would seriously mess with the results, not only in the wanted way. Of course: As I don't have any deeper knowledge of the Bayes algorithm, this was only an example to describe what I mean. Some kind o...

The last days more and more HAM comments are identified as SPAM by my Bayes installation. Janek had the idea that it might come because as time goes by the DB has a lot more SPAM than HAM entries. Wouldn't it be a good idea to put a factor in front of the SPAM calculation, that is dependent on the S...

Btw: at the moment my dashboard (the version you named here) does not show my newest draft, only second newest and down. my newest draft is very new, but now future draft. Do you know any problem here? And what does the ordering of dashboard parts do? It doesn't order the parts in the dashboard (exc...

I can repoduce it easily. If I switch the first dropdown (German: "Datei/Mirror Speicherort (XML-Metadaten) ") to s9y I get the error.

If I switch the first to netmirror and the second to s9y it works. I guess the links you are naming are configured with the second dropdown box?

I think the same. I had them, too, while updating, but doing it again was just fine then.

.. aber dass es das Blog failed liegt dann schon an der developer Version, oder?
Und die SimplePie Version im Repo habe ich so gepatcht, dass sie erst mal nicht abschmiert. Aber vermutlich ist da noch was "verborgenes", wie Garvin schon vermutet.

Tja..

Was genau bringt uns eigentlich dieser E_STRICT check? (Außer dass dadurch brutal viel Code IMHO ziemlich sinnlos erneuert werden muss.. )