Well yes, but this is like shooting with two rifles on the first front, having nothing left behind.
Why should you want to bother Bayes (which is expensive), when the spam is already marked to reject by Bee, and which will be done by Spamblock? That is more than logical, I think.

The tone of this answer sounds like you are charging me... for something... <VALUE> is $this->foundImageLink. <VALUE> is either 1 or empty Thats right. foundImageLink is a true boolean, which, when echoed, gives you 1 or NOTHING. For debugging output you would need to do echo $this->foundImageLink ...

Beside building an extra plugin for this case (and we don't have that yet, AFAIK)... Why should you want to have that...? You can use {serendipity_showPlugin class="serendipity_plugin_freetag"} in an entries_archives.tpl, or even staticpage, for example. And you have the related tags (clou...

Hmm, Ok. Everything else is not used at all or set to moderation. Which does not mean you can disable the use of spamblock plugin at all, since it is internally used by other plugins. (I know you know! This is just a general note!) My Spamfighters work totally unmaintained for years with these first...

sometimes its hard to follow your thoughts... :wink: The code part you pasted has nothing to with it. The break is done by my pasted code part and checks variables defined globally or directly before. foundImageLink is empty (it emits »data-link=""«) on pages that do not contain image lin...

I don't use the SpamBee plugin anymore, it didn't really help much. I know it works well for others, but it did not for me after a certain amount of time. Could you define what this means in detail? Sounds very strange to me, since that could only mean you have real people spamming, or spambots wer...

Don Chambers wrote:Yeah. That's me. A real spammer. I think I sent out a whole 10 emails in the past week!!

Maybe you personally did send 10 only, but you Computer or Server send spam, while being infected?
Its not that easy to get listed to a RBL...

Hmm, strange... I would assume everything is fine. This option should work if header_optimization is set to true AND foundImageLink returns false AND serendipity_plugin_imagesidebar is not installed OR is set to placement ' hide '. In this case(s) the scripts should not show up. If that all is the c...

I'd really like to be able to hide the years there are no blog posts in the year dropdown box... any way to do this? I would say: No! And this, since that is build by a simple counter which does not really interfere with entries, accept for the start year. $custom_sortyears = array(); $custom_sorty...

No!

Because it is in style_fallback.css in master. Yes, if it now works in the Plugin only for every browser - why should we have it in style_fallback? I would pled to (you!) remove it there (again). :) I assumed you wanted to use addToCSS to only emit it in serendipity.css if it is not in style_fallba...

If the fix is in /templates/default/style_fallback.css, it is still emitted in serendipity.css by the lightbox plugin. I assume that is what you meant. If it is missing in style_fallback.css, it is still emitted by the plugin in serendipity.css. Yes that was intended to have. Prepend it to serendip...

test https://github.com/s9y/additional_plugi ... 24db739eb5 without the 2.1 fallback commit ...

Done fd32bc8. Can you please test this with FF and without the 2.1 fallback commit?

Ah - now I see what you were up for.
This is a single line - we should not add an extra file for this!
Can't we use that global for all browsers? And in the plugin only?
If you answer me this, I'll better add that before the sync.