Hallo Garvin,

für mich gibt es im Grunde drei Wünsche, die sich alle mehr auf die Internals von S9Y beziehen.

PHP5-only: neues Objektmodell für bessere Plugin-Struktur ausnutzen. Ich habe gerade stark das Gefühl, dass das ein kritischer Punkt ist. Ich sehe auch immer mehr Leute, die Alternativen ...

No, Garvin especially asked me to fill the reqirements fields. So I would guess it is also implemented for PHP.

Isn't that the reason why Debian-people tend to do the three steps ./configure; make; make install by hand

Strange reason

I just want to get a feeling how wide-spreaded are newer PHP-versions in the S9Y-community. I also would like to know which fact prevent users from using PHP 5. The reason is that I want to know if it is worth adopting more and more PHP5-components and libraries (SimpleXML, DOMDocument, parts of the ...

Hm, that's pretty strange. I've understood, that the requirements specification in the plugin file leads to not displaying the plugin, if you do not fullfill the requirements.

It is mentioned. Did you experienced any problems?

No, it has nothing to do with the sitemap. But the good news is, it has nothing to with Serendipity either, as my personal weblog is indexed fine. I would guess, that the Google blogsearch spider is maybe just the normal Google spider or are there any hints, that this can't be?

Hi Carl,

I want to plug myself shamelessly. I'm owning a hosting company, which is calles Schokokeks.org . This hosting company provides you an account for 7€/month which includes the following features:

PHP 5.2 with suhosin
MySQL 5.0 (as much databases as you need)
Unlimited traffic (limited ...

As long as my small "do the thing right"-plugins are provided via Spartacus I'm honestly don't care.

No, this is just working if the webhoster provides such an solution. To go into details: this is the case, when PHP 4 is configured to server .php and .php4-files and PHP 5 is configured to server .php5 files. If it is that way you can change your settings so that apache will also serve .php-files ...

Isn't that more a "White Stripes - You are pretty good looking for a girl"-theme?

mattsches wrote:About that API key again ... see my post concerning your YouTube plugin

It was not YouTube. But the thing with the API-key should be solved in a sensible way, you are right.

I'm generally not a friend of all-in-one plugins. I prefer sharing libraries and I would like to see a way how plugins can do this. For example my class serendipity_plugins_heavyrotation_helper_audioscrobbler provides a default way how to access the audiscrobbler API.

And, btw: change the provider ...

Hopefully your sysadmin does not know everything about PHP so maybe he left fgetc() or file_get_contents() enabled.

Example for fgetc():
$resource = fopen(__FILE__, 'r');
$string = '';
while (!feof($resource))
$string .= fgetc($resource);

Example for file_get_contents():
$string = file_get ...