Search found 50 matches

by Manko10
Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:08 pm
Forum: Bugs
Topic: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page
Replies: 7
Views: 2614

Re: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page

Ah, okay. Yes, it's there. I only expected it to appear directly on the recycler page.
by Manko10
Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:18 am
Forum: Bugs
Topic: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page
Replies: 7
Views: 2614

Re: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page

I just installed a Bayes update but I still have to delete each page individually. Is this a mistake or did the update just include an earlier patch?
by Manko10
Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:46 pm
Forum: Bugs
Topic: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page
Replies: 7
Views: 2614

Re: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page

Great, I'll have a look at it when it's available through Spartacus.
by Manko10
Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:19 am
Forum: Bugs
Topic: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page
Replies: 7
Views: 2614

Re: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page

What about a button "Select/Unselect all", a checkbox "also mark items on other pages" and a simple "Delete selected" button instead of "Empty recycler"? But anyway: I expect "Empty recycler" to do exactly what it says: empty the recycler. If it just deletes the items on the current page it appears ...
by Manko10
Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:14 pm
Forum: Bugs
Topic: "Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page
Replies: 7
Views: 2614

"Empty recycler" just deletes what's on the current page

A few weeks ago the Bayes plugin introduced pagination for browsing the recycle bin. This is a great feature because it reduces page load times and calculation power needed for rendering the page significantly. So overall it's a great thing to have, but it has one big flaw: when pressing "Empty recy...
by Manko10
Fri Jan 27, 2012 5:54 pm
Forum: Development
Topic: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails
Replies: 7
Views: 4122

Re: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails

This will hardly be pre-installed on any server, but if it's a feature of s9y, the user is free to install it on his webspace. But if they are, the user should set his $PATH properly to include them. Of course, but perhaps he did, not knowing that s9y uses the same command. But if we let the user ch...
by Manko10
Fri Jan 27, 2012 5:29 pm
Forum: Development
Topic: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails
Replies: 7
Views: 4122

Re: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails

I just wanted to start writing the patch, but I'm not so sure what the best way is to determine the paths of pnquant, pncrush and jpegoptim. I could just issue the commands, but, I'm hesitating to do that because I can't know which command I really call. It could also do something else if the user w...
by Manko10
Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:16 pm
Forum: Development
Topic: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails
Replies: 7
Views: 4122

Re: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails

BTW In order to be able to determine the color-depth of the image file I have to use some third-party function like this: https://github.com/ktomk/Miscellaneous/blob/master/get_png_imageinfo/get_png_imageinfo.php It is a libary for inspecting PNG files for things like color depth, color type etc. It...
by Manko10
Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:49 pm
Forum: Development
Topic: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails
Replies: 7
Views: 4122

Re: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails

I guess I can do that. Although I haven't been too much into the s9y code.
by Manko10
Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:28 am
Forum: Development
Topic: Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails
Replies: 7
Views: 4122

Feature suggestion: optimizing thumbnails

Hi there, I'm using pngquant (http://pngquant.org/) for some of my images to reduce them to 8-bit of color depth which is often more than enough. pngquant does a very good job at compressing my images (especially illustration artwork and screenshots, not so good on real photos). Even fake alpha tran...
by Manko10
Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:15 pm
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Invalid URLs for "Edit" links
Replies: 3
Views: 2013

Re: Invalid URLs for "Edit" links

Is this really in so many places? I just discovered it in these two cases: editing blog entries where I worked around it in the template with <a href="{$entry.link_edit|replace:"[":"%5B"|replace:"]":"%5D"}">{$CONST.EDIT_ENTRY}</a> and for the sidebar modules where I don't have control over the links...
by Manko10
Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:50 am
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Invalid URLs for "Edit" links
Replies: 3
Views: 2013

Invalid URLs for "Edit" links

Hey guys! The generated links for editing individual articles or sidebar plugins contain invalid characters. The URLs look like this: http://www.example.com/serendipity_admin.php?serendipity[action]=admin&serendipity[adminModule]=entries&serendipity[adminAction]=edit&serendipity[id]=123 The square b...
by Manko10
Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:34 pm
Forum: Upcoming Serendipity Features
Topic: markitup pseudo WYSIWYG editor
Replies: 15
Views: 8640

Re: markitup pseudo WYSIWYG editor

One could as well argue that it's a waste of time to smartify every bit of the s9y core just to enable proper markup in a disappearing standard. Imagine being able to easily modify any HTML, CSS and JS created by core components or plugins without having to dig through PHP code. (no words) ;-) Howe...
by Manko10
Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:47 pm
Forum: Upcoming Serendipity Features
Topic: markitup pseudo WYSIWYG editor
Replies: 15
Views: 8640

Re: markitup pseudo WYSIWYG editor

No, and as far as I can see, we don't. I think we do. <br /> might be valid HTML5, but not valid HTML 4.01. As I wrote in another thread here: there is much hardcoded HTML in s9y and especially in the plugins, so it is not possible to create valid HTML 4.01 templates with Serendipity. However, if e...
by Manko10
Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:30 pm
Forum: Upcoming Serendipity Features
Topic: markitup pseudo WYSIWYG editor
Replies: 15
Views: 8640

Re: markitup pseudo WYSIWYG editor

Here's the thing: Not only is <br/> perfectly valid in HTML5, some people actually prefer to use the slash syntax for self-closing elements. Unfortunately yes. Obviously, those people prefer it since they are used to writing XHMTL syntax I was one of those XHTML guys as well. I considered the norma...