I don't know if our expectations are THAT high!!!!garvinhicking wrote:......Especially if you want bulletproof to be used for virtually every s9y template.
OK - I accept the date stuff as proposed.
I must have been confused. I seemed to remember the fixed thing requiring horizontal scrolling in 1024x768, which is of course BS. Other than that, I really don't have a preference, although I think the fixed one looks a little bit more ... erm ... "finished", I guess. So let's not discuss this to death and go with the fixed one as defaultDon Chambers wrote:Anyway, do YOU personally prefer the fluid over the fixed???
I ususally don't talk about anal, thanks (Just kidding, I of course know what you meant )Don Chambers wrote:Hell, I just moved one of the icons down 2 pixels this morning!!! Talk about anal!!! LOL!!!
I really don't. Just go ahead writing drafts, I'm going to update it to svn 1.2 tomorrow at the latest. Then we'll see what's happening.Don Chambers wrote:Other than that, I agree on the docsite stuff. Right now I cannot publish any entry!!!!!! Only choice is draft, even though I am a member of the admin group. Wanna poke around inside the database and see if you can determine the cause simply by comparing each of our respective settings?
The fixed version does not require horizontal scrolling.yellowled wrote:I seemed to remember the fixed thing requiring horizontal scrolling in 1024x768, which is of course BS.
Get rid of height: 1% in base.css and add width: 100%. The height thing was put in there for IE6, but width: 100% works just fine in IE6. I know it did not in an earlier version, but I'll bet that could also have been related to that nasty equal column height method we have since removed.yellowled wrote:Anyway, I'm proud (Gnarf.) to announce we have another bug. Robert Lender kindly jumped in as a Mac beta tester, and he reported via email that the footer doesn't expand to it's full width in Safari or Opera/Mac. I can reproduce it in Opera/Linux, and I hear there's a Safari/Win beta available, so I'll check that out later and try to fix it.
Do you have any idea how to add hacks for Safari and/or Opera by any chance?
I know. That's why it was BS to assume it did.Don Chambers wrote:The fixed version does not require horizontal scrolling.yellowled wrote:I seemed to remember the fixed thing requiring horizontal scrolling in 1024x768, which is of course BS.
I came up with width: 100% myself, but had to add a padding: 0.25em 0!important to the IE stylesheets to fix that in IE. Fuckin' box model bug. I'll try losing the height later, maybe we can skip the padding thing in the IE stylesheets.Don Chambers wrote:Get rid of height: 1% in base.css and add width: 100%. The height thing was put in there for IE6, but width: 100% works just fine in IE6.
Just tried it in Safari/Win (Beta3), works like a charm. I do have Opera, but that footer bug somehow got past me. I have to admit I haven't looked at it in Opera as much as I have in FF or IEDon Chambers wrote:I do not have Safari or Opera, so unfortunately, I have never paid much attention to those hacks.
Got it covered. Just send me the code for the footer thingy.Don Chambers wrote:In fact, I am adding stuff to the css files for this footer nav thing, so if you want to hold off, I will make that change myself and send everything to you.
I did!Don Chambers wrote:Yeah, SURE you figured it out yourself!!!
Probably because padding's basically a nice thing unless it screws up the display in IE ... as far as I can see, just losing the height doesn't do the trick in IE, but I tested it in kind of a hurry, so I'll check it out again later with http://www.yellowled.de/tmp/bulletproof-beta3a.zip.Don Chambers wrote:I was just looking at the padding stuff..... not sure why we even have padding for #footer, which exists in style.css AND the colorsets.
I like it. I'll never love it since I wouldn't use it myself, but it's very decent and definitely a nice option to have. BTW: This is the last new feature, option or tweak we're adding. From now until release it's all bughunting (but I'm sure we won't find any more until release) and writing documentation!Don Chambers wrote:Emailed you my revisions for the footer ...ummm.... "thingy".
Code: Select all
/* container for comments when comment pop-up enabled */
.s9y_wrap {
text-align: left;
font-size: 69%;
margin-left: 10px;
}
Code: Select all
'width=600,height=480,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes'
I'll check that out. I'm IMing with Garvin right now for some other changes.Don Chambers wrote:I suggested we add margin-bottom: 0.5em to .serendipity_Entry_Date awhile back, and it does exist in style.css as a result of that suggestion. I'm thinking that, either in addition to this, or in lieu of it, we need the same margin on the presently undefined .serendipity_entry. Probably in lieu of it.
Erm, the current version is the best I came up with so for. width: auto didn't work for me in IE6 or Safari. I'll take a look at it later.Don Chambers wrote:That footer issue still needs resolution. I am not chasing it at the moment and hope YL is. How's that coming YL?
I'm guessing we can't.Don Chambers wrote:Do you have time to tackle all this, or do you want YL or I to see if either/both of us can find the time to help you (assuming we can LOL)???
I have already completed (yeah, well, almost ...) my first BP derivate, the template for my own blog including a colorset for a friend. This is so much fun. You basically have to do nothing! Well, it's probably a tad more for templates loaded with graphics, but it definitely is a great base code to work with.Don Chambers wrote:In a way, I'm kinda glad our deadline is approaching - it will make us stop tinkering with BP and actually start USING it!!!